Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gingerbread man's avatar

On the topic of gov investment.

If we believe AI can (1) lead to mass unemployment due to replacing human labor, and (2) have a military impact like the Manhattan project.

Why doesn't it make sense for the gov to have some ownership?

Majority ownership is probably not the right way. But some decent percent to ensure the public has some say + can profit in the long run. Why not?

Not the best example, but Israeli Refael is gov owned and not publicly traded.

Israeli gov has stake in other defense companies too.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?